[gmx-users] first residue in chains warning issue
m21.tang at qut.edu.au
Sat May 23 12:39:30 CEST 2015
For a stable system, is it true that it can be equilibrated endlessly without error? I got LINCS errors when my protein had been equilibrated for about 50ns. Does this mean that there is some wrong with my system?
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se [mailto:gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf Of Justin Lemkul
Sent: Saturday, 23 May 2015 6:24 AM
To: gmx-users at gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-users] first residue in chains warning issue
On 5/22/15 3:39 AM, Ming Tang wrote:
> Dear Justin,
> Is there any significant difference between the equilibrated states of the protein equilibrated by NPT with all-bonds constrained and without any constraints?
> If the difference is quite small, then I can choose constraining bonds to increase time step.
This is generally (read: pretty much always) what people do in biomolecular simulations. The bonds are rarely (read: practically never) excited from their ground state, so constraints are a reasonable approximation. This isn't universal, but it's definitely true in most biological systems at ambient conditions.
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441 http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users