[gmx-users] PDB files
soumadwip ghosh
soumadwipghosh at gmail.com
Fri May 29 11:38:47 CEST 2015
Hi all,
I have a general query about PDB files. I have made a PDB file for a
carbon nanotube (15x15) using VMD which contains 1600 carbon atoms. As far
as I know, the PDB file should contain atom no. in lines 13-16 and the
residue id in line 18-20. Now,I obtained the pdb file from VMD as follows-
ATOM 993 C UNK 1 6.595 7.749 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 994 C UNK 1 8.477 5.630 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 995 C UNK 1 9.179 4.394 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 996 C UNK 1 10.034 1.692 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 997 C UNK 1 10.172 0.278 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 998 C UNK 1 9.855 -2.538 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 999 C UNK 1 9.405 -3.886 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1000 C UNK 1 7.968 -6.329 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1001 C UNK 1 7.009 -7.378 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1002 C UNK 1 4.702 -9.025 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1003 C UNK 1 3.399 -9.592 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1004 C UNK 1 0.622 -10.157 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1005 C UNK 1 -0.799 -10.145 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1006 C UNK 1 -3.566 -9.531 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1007 C UNK 1 -4.859 -8.941 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1008 C UNK 1 -7.136 -7.255 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1009 C UNK 1 -8.077 -6.190 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1010 C UNK 1 -9.471 -3.722 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1011 C UNK 1 -9.897 -2.366 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1012 C UNK 1 -10.166 0.455 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1013 C UNK 1 -10.004 1.867 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1014 C UNK 1 -9.101 4.553 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1015 C UNK 1 -8.378 5.777 40.611 1.00 0.00
ATOM 1016 C UNK 1 -6.460 7.863 40.611 1.00 0.00
and so on. Now my question is, if I make a topology, whether by pdb2gmx or
by topology builders such as SWISSPARAM, do I need to number carbon atoms
like C1, C2 ,C3 in the third column of the pdb? It is difficult since
numbering carbon atoms would lead to the third column from line # 13-17
once the index goes pass 999. Why I asking this is I am trying to build the
topology of this nanotube using SWISSPARAM. I am converting this pdb to
mol2 format and upload it on the server but the job in SWISSPARAM fails and
it complains about the numbering of carbon atoms should have been like C1,
C2, C3 and so on. I am using CHARMM force field and thats why I cant use
g_x2top either for building the topology of a carbon nanotube or graphene
at all in any conventional method. Any help in this regard will be most
appreciated.
Soumadwip
Research Fellow,
IITB
India
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list