[gmx-users] Fwd: NVT to NVE ensemble, energy drifting problem
gozde ergin
gozdeeergin at gmail.com
Fri Nov 6 10:32:06 CET 2015
Hi Mark,
As your suggestion I used cutoff sheme = Verlet with running in Gromacs 5.1
Now instead of decreasing, total energy kept increasing! Do you think this
behavior is normal?
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kinetic En. 8537.49 180 386.122 1253.25
(kJ/mol)
Potential -20741.9 530 1092.62 3652.89
(kJ/mol)
Total Energy -12204.4 710 1449.39 4906.14
(kJ/mol)
Temperature 319.933 6.7 14.4695 46.9643 (K)
Thanks in advance.
On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So that means you are using the group cutoff scheme without a cutoff
> buffer, which is known not to conserve energy (see manual sections on
> neighbour searching). You can either choose a group-scheme model physics
> where the buffer (set with rlist) is suitably larger than the cutoffs
> (which is awkward to set up and will run slowly), or use the Verlet scheme
> (which has a buffer by default and runs fast) which is now default in 5.1.
> Even with that fixed, the use of constraints intrinsically leads to drift,
> also. Whether the remaining drift matters for your simulation (vs the
> decrease in sampling you would have to accept in order to start to deal
> with it) is an open research question.
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 1:23 PM gozde ergin <gozdeeergin at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > - system 512 water molecule covered by 25 organic on each surface,
> > - I used both gromacs 4.5 and 5.0 with and without double precision
> > - .mdp file is :
> >
> > integrator = md
> > dt = 0.002
> > nsteps = 10000000 ; 20 ns
> > nstxout = 10000
> > nstvout = 10000
> > nstlog = 10000
> > nstenergy = 10000
> > continuation = no
> > constraint_algorithm = lincs
> > constraints = all-bonds
> > lincs_iter = 1
> > lincs_order = 4
> > ns_type = grid
> > nstlist = 5
> > rlist = 1.2
> > rcoulomb = 1.2
> > rvdw = 1.2
> > coulombtype = PME
> > pme_order = 4
> > fourierspacing = 0.16
> > tcoupl = nose-hoover
> > tc-grps = System
> > tau_t = 1.0
> > ref_t = 300
> > Pcoupl = No
> > pbc = xyz
> > DispCorr = EnerPres
> > gen_vel = yes
> > gen_temp = 310
> > gen_seed = -1
> > nstcomm = 10
> > comm-mode = Linear
> > comm-grps = System
> >
> > hope it is readable now!
> >
> > best
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > You're making it very hard to help you, by not providing a readable
> .mdp
> > > file, not specifying a GROMACS version, nor describing what is in your
> > > system. If there was a magic "do this and energy is conserved" button
> > then
> > > it'd be already pushed for you ;-)
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 11:34 AM gozde ergin <gozdeeergin at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Ganesh
> > > >
> > > > I tried your suggestion and this time instead of decreasing,
> potential
> > > and
> > > > kinetic energy kept increasing!
> > > > So still could not get the converged-constant energy for NVE.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Ganesh Shahane <
> > ganesh7shahane at gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Hi Gozde,
> > > > >
> > > > > You could try modifying and introduce some of the parameters as
> > follows
> > > > > (keeping the rest same) -
> > > > >
> > > > > lincs_iter = 2
> > > > > rvdw-switch = 1.1
> > > > > vdwtype = Cut-off
> > > > > vdw-modifier = Force-switch
> > > > >
> > > > > I recently faced some of the same problems as yours and the above
> > > > > parameters worked for me.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 2:47 PM, gozde ergin <gozdeeergin at gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Dear Chaban,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I decreased the time step and also I run by using double
> precision
> > > > > however
> > > > > > energy kept decreasing and did not converge.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Does anybody has an opinion how to run NVE simulation in Gromacs
> > > > without
> > > > > > energy drifting?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bests
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Vitaly V. Chaban <
> > vvchaban at gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Decrease the time-step.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 3:00 PM, gozde ergin <
> > gozdeeergin at gmail.com
> > > >
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > > > > > > From: gozde ergin <gozdeeergin at gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > Date: Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 5:39 PM
> > > > > > > > Subject: NVT to NVE ensemble, energy drifting problem
> > > > > > > > To: mailing list Gromacs <
> > > > gromacs.org_gmx-users at maillist.sys.kth.se>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Dear Gromacs user,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I did some simulation in NVT ensemble now I need to switch
> and
> > do
> > > > > some
> > > > > > > more
> > > > > > > > simulations in NVE ensemble.
> > > > > > > > What properties do I need to change in .mdp file to get a
> good
> > > > energy
> > > > > > > > conversion?
> > > > > > > > I used the same properties like NVT without temperature
> > coupling
> > > > but
> > > > > my
> > > > > > > > potential and kinetic energy drifted a lot.
> > > > > > > > What should I do prevent this drifting?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Here is my nvt.mdp:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > *integrator = md dt =
> > > > > > > > 0.002nsteps = 10000000 ; 20 nsnstxout
> > > > > > > > = 10000nstvout = 10000nstlog
> > =
> > > > > > > > 10000nstenergy = 10000continuation =
> no
> > > > > > > > constraint_algorithm = lincs constraints =
> all-bonds
> > > > > > > > lincs_iter = 1 lincs_order = 4
> > > > > ns_type
> > > > > > > > = grid nstlist = 5 rlist
> =
> > > > > > > > 1.2 rcoulomb = 1.2 rvdw
> =
> > > > > > > > 1.2 coulombtype = PME pme_order
> =
> > > > > > > > 4 fourierspacing = 0.16 tcoupl
> > > > > =
> > > > > > > > nose-hoovertc-grps = Systemtau_t
> > > > > =
> > > > > > > > 1.0ref_t = 300Pcoupl =
> > Nopbc
> > > > > =
> > > > > > > > xyz DispCorr = EnerPres gen_vel
> > =
> > > > > > > > yes gen_temp = 310 gen_seed =
> > > > > > > > -1 nstcomm = 10comm-mode =
> > > > > > > > Linearcomm-grps = System *
> > > > > > > > For nve, I just make the temperature coupling off and used
> the
> > > same
> > > > > > > > properties however as I mentioned my energy could not
> converged
> > > in
> > > > 20
> > > > > > ns.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks in advance
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > > > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List
> > > before
> > > > > > > > posting!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > * Can't post? Read
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > > > > >
> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> > > > > or
> > > > > > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List
> > before
> > > > > > > posting!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * Can't post? Read
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > > > >
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> > > > or
> > > > > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List
> before
> > > > > > posting!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > > > >
> > > > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > > >
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> > > or
> > > > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Best Regards,
> > > > > Ganesh Shahane
> > > > > --
> > > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > > >
> > > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > > > posting!
> > > > >
> > > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > > >
> > > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> > or
> > > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > >
> > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > > posting!
> > > >
> > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > >
> > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> or
> > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > >
> > > * Please search the archive at
> > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > posting!
> > >
> > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > >
> > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > >
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list