[gmx-users] Dihedral Coeffecient Conversion
Mark Abraham
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Tue Oct 27 15:23:51 CET 2015
Hi,
The manuals document the functional forms in which the parameters are used,
which you can compare. I'm not sure what you mean by "AMBER form" but any
conversion is a matter of high-school trigonometry :-)
Mark
On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 2:35 PM Edwin Fernando Gomez <efgomez at my.uno.edu>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> I am an undergraduate worker and I am trying to convert a Gromacs
> Ryckaert-Bellemans form dihedral to AMBER dihedral form. The dihedral I am
> interested in is:
>
>
>
> CM-CT-CT-NT 3 3.33465 -1.55226 2.82001 -4.60240 0.00000 0.00000
> ; (From wildcard) amine all-atom
>
>
>
> This dihedral comes from the oplsaaff.itp file. I want to know if there is
> a formula specific for converting Gromacs Ryckaert-Bellemans form to AMBER
> form. I have been looking at the gromacs manual and the AMBER manual and I
> have not seen a formula for conversion from one force field functional form
> to the other. Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you,
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Ed
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list