[gmx-users] topology error
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Fri Aug 19 14:20:10 CEST 2016
On 8/19/16 8:05 AM, kalai sivam wrote:
> dear, all gromacs user
> i have to assign the co-ordinate to create the topology.
> from your suggestion , I include the missing parameters...
> but still one error i can't rectify..
>
>
> say some information about the co-ordinate file...
>
>
> *My parameters are:*
>
>
> [ atoms ]
> ; nr type resnr residue atom cgnr charge mass
> typeB chargeB massB
> ; residue 111 CME rtp CME q +0.5
> 1 opls_238 111 CME N 1 -0.5 14.0067 ;
> qtot -0.5
> 2 opls_241 111 CME NH1 1 0.23 1.008 ;
> qtot -0.27
> 3 opls_241 111 CME NH2 1 0.27 1.008 ;
> qtot 0
> 4 opls_206 111 CME CA 2 -0.18 12.011 ;
> qtot -0.18
> 5 opls_140 111 CME HA1 2 0.18 1.008 ;
> qtot 0
> 6 opls_157 111 CME C 3 0.145 12.011 ;
> qtot 0.145
> 7 opls_140 111 CME HH11 3 0.06 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.205
> 8 opls_140 111 CME HH12 3 0.06 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.265
> 9 opls_154 111 CME OH1 3 0.683 15.9994 ;
> qtot 0.948
> 10 opls_155 111 CME HO1 3 -0.418 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.53
> 11 opls_214 111 CME CB 4 0.0975 12.011 ;
> qtot 0.6275
> 12 opls_140 111 CME HB1 4 0.06 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.6875
> 13 opls_140 111 CME HB2 4 0.06 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.7475
> 14 opls_208 111 CME SG 4 -0.2175 12.011 ;
> qtot 0.53
> 15 opls_210 111 CME SD 5 -0.2175 12.011 ;
> qtot 0.3125
> 16 opls_206 111 CME CE 5 0.0975 12.011 ;
> qtot 0.41
> 17 opls_140 111 CME HE1 5 0.06 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.47
> 18 opls_140 111 CME HE2 5 0.06 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.53
> 19 opls_157 111 CME CZ 6 0.145 12.011 ;
> qtot 0.675
> 20 opls_140 111 CME HZ1 6 0.06 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.735
> 21 opls_140 111 CME HZ2 6 0.06 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.795
> 22 opls_154 111 CME OH 6 -0.683 15.9994 ;
> qtot 0.112
> 23 opls_155 111 CME HO 6 0.418 1.008 ;
> qtot 0.53
>
>
>
> * Error has been:*
>
>
>
> *ERROR 1 [file topol.top, line 178]: No default Ryckaert-Bell. types*
>
>
> NOTE 1 [file topol.top, line 242]:
> System has non-zero total charge: 0.530000
> Total charge should normally be an integer. See
> http://www.gromacs.org/Documentation/Floating_Point_Arithmetic
> for discussion on how close it should be to an integer.
>
>
>
> please, say some clarification..
>
Your net charge is physically unreasonable, so start by assigning proper charges.
For the missing dihedral, check that you are using correct atom types for the
missing interaction and reassign them if you are not. If the types are correct,
then you need to parametrize the missing dihedral in a manner consistent with
the parent force field. For OPLS, this means a 1-dimensional QM potential
energy scan to which you fit the necessary dihedral term(s).
-Justin
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list