[gmx-users] Force-switch algorithm
Mark Abraham
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Mon Jan 4 19:33:56 CET 2016
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 9:48 AM Pallavi Banerjee <
pallavisept at students.iiserpune.ac.in> wrote:
> Thank you for your reply, Mark! I have now thought of modifying my input
> potential, that is, making changes to the tabulated form of potential.
Yes, this is what you need to do if somehow you know you need a tabulated
interaction and force-switch. But I can't imagine why you know this, and
are also considering potential-switch...
I
> don't really understand the difference between the algorithms of
> force-switch and potential-switch. Does force-switch algorithm directly act
> on the forces without making changes to the potential?
No, to model actual physics, one should be the derivative of the other. ;-)
> Is the
> potential-switch function the integrated form of the force-switch function
> or is it different altogether?
>
Different altogether, as you can see at
http://manual.gromacs.org/documentation/5.1.1/user-guide/mdp-options.html#van-der-waals.
(I would regard the fact that there's no documentation of the functional
form of the potential-switch as its own terrible warning...)
Mark
>
> Many Thanks!
>
> -Pallavi Banerjee
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list