[gmx-users] Constraining positions according to B-factors
Irem Altan
irem.altan at duke.edu
Fri Jan 15 16:57:06 CET 2016
Hi,
Thank you for your answer, I will try that. I realize it’s unphysical, but I want to compare certain properties of the protein to diffraction data.
Just to double check: the values in [position_restraints] are in units of kJ/(mol*nm^2), right?
Best,
Irem
> On Jan 15, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar <tsjerkw at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Irem,
>
> Okay. First remove all bonded and nonbonded interactions, because these are
> what gives rise to the thermal fluctuations in a real crystal. So you would
> only need an [ atoms ] section and a section with [ position_restraints ].
> You should be able to calculate a spring constants based on the
> experimental b-factors. Then, if you perform the simulation and calculate
> the b-factors, you should be able to reproduce what you put in.
>
> But seriously, why would you want that? There is no force in nature that
> keeps atoms pinned to some xyz coordinate in space. What you see as thermal
> motion is the result of the constraints due to the interactions there are.
> Of course, that means in the context the molecule is in. If you want to
> simulate b-factors in a crystal, you've gotta simulate a crystal. Using
> physics, not using artificial means to try to reproduce what you put in.
>
> Hope it helps,
>
> Tsjerk
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Irem Altan <irem.altan at duke.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Yes, assuming a harmonic potential, I want to be able to constrain atoms
>> such that their mean square displacement during the simulation will be
>> compatible with their B-factors.
>>
>> Best,
>> Irem
>>
>>> On Jan 15, 2016, at 1:32 AM, Tsjerk Wassenaar <tsjerkw at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
>>> Under the assumption that the B-factor is caused by some atom-specific
>>> force that keeps it pinned to a certain position?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Tsjerk
>>> On Jan 15, 2016 01:18, "Irem Altan" <irem.altan at duke.edu> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I was wondering if it was possible to constrain protein atom positions
>>>> according to their B-factors, so that their RMS displacement during the
>>>> simulation will be compatible with their B-factors. If so, could you
>> point
>>>> me towards a helpful resource?
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Irem
>>>> --
>>>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>>>
>>>> * Please search the archive at
>>>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>>>> posting!
>>>>
>>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>>>
>>>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>>>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>>>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>>
>>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>> posting!
>>>
>>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>>
>>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>
>> --
>> Gromacs Users mailing list
>>
>> * Please search the archive at
>> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
>> posting!
>>
>> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>
>> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
>> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Tsjerk A. Wassenaar, Ph.D.
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list