[gmx-users] Avoiding Cubic Spline Table non-bonded VdW kernel

[Mark Abraham]

Hi,

Switched interactions were implemented with tables, because that was faster
back when that design decision was made. There's a recent publication at
http://md.chem.rug.nl/ that suggests useful faster alternatives.

Mark

On Thu, Mar 3, 2016 at 1:26 PM Dave Michael <dm.cid.lab at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey guys,
>
> While trying to simulate a pure Martini water solvent (Solvent systems
> <http://md.chem.rug.nl/index.php/example-applications2/solvent-systems>) (
> water.gro <http://md.chem.rug.nl/images/applications/water/water.gro>,
> water.mdp <http://md.chem.rug.nl/images/applications/water/water.mdp>,
> water.top <http://md.chem.rug.nl/images/applications/water/water.top>) the
> most used kernel for non-bonded interactions is
> nb_kernel_ElecNone_VdwCSTab_GeomP1P1_F_c
>
> How can I modify the .mdp  to force gmx to use a kernel that computes the
> force via pure floating-point computation and which one of these VdW
> kernels is the most precise one?
>
> David
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>