[gmx-users] Suggested settings for using Amber force field in Gromacs
Dries Van Rompaey
dries.vanrompaey at gmail.com
Thu May 5 15:05:33 CEST 2016
Your first stop should be the article describing the parametrisation of the force field. It might also be useful to look for articles that are doing something similar to what you want to do.
> On 05 May 2016, at 14:49, Casalini Tommaso <tommaso.casalini at chem.ethz.ch> wrote:
> Dear Gromacs users and developers,
> I would like to use Amber force field in Gromacs.
> I have no problem for topology conversion and so on, but I would like to ask which are the best settings which should be used for the simulation.
> Right now I am using Berendsen barostat (which is implemented in Amber), PME for electrostatic interactions and Langevin thermostat. I have also put DispEner = no.
> I would like to ask if you can provide some suggestions for the best settings that, in your experience, should be used for simulations using Amber force field.
> I thank you in advance for your help and collaboration.
> Tommaso Casalini
> Posdoctoral fellow, ETH Zurich
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users