[gmx-users] NMA problems with mass-weighting -m option

[Tsjerk Wassenaar]

Hi Riccardo,

The boolean options are specified as -m or -nom, without further arguments.
For non-mass-weigthed you want -nom.

Hope it helps,

Tsjerk
On May 27, 2016 15:49, "Ravasio Riccardo" <riccardo.ravasio at epfl.ch> wrote:

> Dear gmx users,
>
>
> After performing Normal Mode Analysis, I would like to print a non
> mass-weighted spectrum, but both with option -m false and with -m true I
> get mass-weighted eigenvalues and eigenvectors. Why? I'm using version
> 5.1.2. I looked at the source code, but it was of version 3.2.0: maybe the
> -m option was forgotten in the last version? Or, what am I doing wrong?
>
>
> I'm using the usual following commands:
>
>
> gmx_d grompp -v -f nma.mdp -c $STRUCT-vacuum-min$((sample-1)).gro -p
> $STRUCT.top -o $STRUCT-vacuum-nma.tpr
>
>
> gmx_d mdrun -v -s $STRUCT-vacuum-nma.tpr -mtx $STRUCT-vacumm-nma.mtx
>
>
> gmx_d nmeig -f $STRUCT-vacumm-nma.mtx -s $STRUCT-vacuum-nma.tpr -m true
> -last 3693
>
>
> I tried to put also 0/1 or yes/no, but nothing changes.
>
>
> I thank you for your kindness and for your help.
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
> Riccardo
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>