[gmx-users] problem with gmx genconf?
Thejus Kartha
thejuskartha at ymail.com
Mon Oct 10 03:26:42 CEST 2016
Well, the literature reports a non-zero dipole moment and hence, a polarity index of 4.8 for 1,4-dioxane. So does the organic chemist nearby. I'm not sure if I understand your perspective, Dr. Lemkul. I'm clearly missing something here.
I should also mention that I have run simulations of ethanol which has a polarity index of 5.2 on the same scale as 1,4-dioxane. These were done on a GROMOS43a1 forcefield too, on GROMACS. This leaves me thoroughly confused as what to do.
Also, if I am to model such polar solvents in the future, is there a particular force field which you could suggest?
On Monday, 10 October 2016 6:14 AM, Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu> wrote:
On 10/9/16 8:26 PM, Thejus Kartha wrote:
> I'm sorry Dr. Lemkul. I thought I put the links for the images I uploaded on Google Drive. Let me try it again.
> The single molecule:
> https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B3dugKVFN2ajTmZMYVdOX0NfbGM
> The system that was generated by genconf:https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B3dugKVFN2ajSDdiampwREVoeUU
>
Don't use -shuf. You're scrambling your molecules.
> Regarding the charges in the topology, I produced them myself using a minimization in Avogadro. I was guessing that was sufficient. It also made sense to me, since dioxane is a polar molecule with non-zero dipole moment. There is no necessity that the system I deal with must have zero charge, is there?
>
This is wrong. It is a symmetrical molecule and in the absence of an external
electric field, will in fact have a zero net dipole moment. It may have
non-zero components of the dipole vector, but the total net dipole is zero.
The fractional charges absolutely must sum to zero in this molecule. Ionized
molecules can have *integral* charges (-1, +1, etc) but no molecule can have a
fractional charge. You can't acquire 46.6% of an electron, can you? That's
what your topology is doing.
You should be building this topology based on any available linear or cyclic
ether parameters available in GROMOS, or use a force field that you can
parametrize more easily.
-Justin
> Thank you.
> Thejus Kartha
>
> On Monday, 10 October 2016 5:47 AM, Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu> wrote:
>
>
>
> None of your screenshots work; most users receive mail in plain text. If you
> want to share files or images, upload them somewhere and provide a link.
>
> <snip>
>
>> [ atoms ]
>> ; nr type resnr residue atom cgnr charge mass typeB chargeB massB
>> ; residue 903 DOX rtp DOX q -0.5
>> 1 CH2 903 DOX CA 1 0.071 14.027 ; qtot 0.071
>> 2 CH2 903 DOX CB 1 0.071 14.027 ; qtot 0.142
>> 3 CH2 903 DOX CD 1 0.071 14.027 ; qtot 0.213
>> 4 CH2 903 DOX CE 1 0.071 14.027 ; qtot 0.284
>> 5 OA 903 DOX OF 1 -0.375 15.9994 ; qtot -0.091
>> 6 OA 903 DOX OG 1 -0.375 15.9994 ; qtot -0.466
>
> This topology is complete nonsense. You have a net charge of -0.466. I don't
> know where you got those charges, but they make no sense whatsoever.
>
> -Justin
>
>>
>> [ bonds ]
>> ; ai aj funct c0 c1 c2 c3
>> 1 2 2 gb_14
>> 1 6 2 gb_12
>> 2 5 2 gb_12
>> 3 4 2 gb_14
>> 3 5 2 gb_12
>> 4 6 2 gb_12
>>
>> [ pairs ]
>> ; ai aj funct c0 c1 c2 c3
>> 1 3 1
>> 2 4 1
>> 5 6 1
>>
>> [ angles ]
>> ; ai aj ak funct c0 c1 c2 c3
>> 2 1 6 2 ga_14
>> 1 2 5 2 ga_14
>> 4 3 5 2 ga_14
>> 3 4 6 2 ga_14
>> 2 5 3 2 ga_9
>> 1 6 4 2 ga_9
>>
>> [ dihedrals ]
>> ; ai aj ak al funct c0 c1 c2 c3 c4 c5
>> 6 1 2 5 1 gd_1
>> 2 1 6 4 1 gd_2
>> 1 2 5 3 1 gd_2
>> 5 3 4 6 1 gd_1
>> 4 3 5 2 1 gd_2
>> 3 4 6 1 1 gd_2
>>
>> ; Include Position restraint file
>> #ifdef POSRES
>> #include "posre.itp"
>> #endif
>>
>> ; Include water topology
>> #include "gromos43a1.ff/spce.itp"
>>
>> #ifdef POSRES_WATER
>> ; Position restraint for each water oxygen
>> [ position_restraints ]
>> ; i funct fcx fcy fcz
>> 1 1 1000 1000 1000
>> #endif
>>
>> ; Include topology for ions
>> #include "gromos43a1.ff/ions.itp"
>>
>> [ system ]
>> ; Name
>> DIOXANE
>>
>> [ molecules ]
>> ; Compound #mols
>> DOX 1--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> But, when I use the gmx genconf command to expand it into a collection of molecules (8 x 8 x 8 box), the result contains disordered molecules as seen in my VMD window. However, the .gro file produced after the genconf seems to be looking fine though. The genconf generated system looks like this:
>> Screenshot from 2016-10-10 05-12-09.png
>> As you can see, the molecules are not seen correctly, that is, there are many places where I have an oxygen in the place of carbon, vice-versa, only carbon containing rings, so on and so forth. Can you please let me know what's going on? I mean, there's no reason why gmx genconf shouldn't be just duplicating the molecule I give it.
>>
>> The command I used:
>> gmx genconf -f dioxane.gro -o diox.gro -nbox 8 8 8 -dist 0.3 -shuffle -rot
>>
>>
>> |
>> |
>> |
>> | | |
>>
>> |
>>
>> |
>> |
>> | |
>> Screenshot from 2016-10-10 05-12-09.png
>> | |
>>
>> |
>>
>> |
>>
>>
>> Thanks & regards,Thejus Kartha
>>
>
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
==================================================
--
Gromacs Users mailing list
* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list