[gmx-users] Free Energy of Binding Question
Hannes.Loeffler at stfc.ac.uk
Tue Sep 20 14:46:02 CEST 2016
It usually helps to draw a thermodynamic cycle to inform yourself what
exactly you are doing.
What you seem to have been doing is to decouple the ligand, once from
the WT and once from the MUT. This should give you the "absolute"
binding free energy. Computing the difference between those values
will give you the relative binding free energy. It is unclear to me
what exactly you mean with dG=1134 kJ/mol but if this is the absolute
binding free energy it seems to be excessively high. But without
knowing the details regarding the setup and simulation protocol it will
not be possible to find out what could have gone wrong.
Of course, you could also compute the relative free energy by
transforming WT to MUT, once in presence of the ligand and once without
the ligand (side-chain mutation). Principally, both approaches should
give you comparable results.
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 11:48:21 +0000
Abdülkadir KOÇAK <kocak at gtu.edu.tr> wrote:
> Dear GMX Community,
> I am aiming to compare the relative binding energy (BE) of a ligand
> to wild type (WT) vs mutant (MUT) protein and thus trying to run a
> Free Energy Calculation for the binding energy of the ligand to both
> proteins (WT and MUT) using Bennett Acceptance Ratio (BAR).
> As the first step, I calculated decoupling of the ligand from both
> proteins in two seperate MD runs by first turning off the coulombic
> interaction and then the van der waals interaction. The next step
> would be the solvation free energies of the ligand in order to get
> the correct BE. However, the ligand is the same for both WT and MUT,
> so in terms of getting relative BE, should we still calculate the
> ligand in water or will the ligand solv energies will cancel in the
> Besides, from the decoupling of the Protein-ligand complex, I am
> getting very high DG values (1134 kJ/mol). Is this meaningful or not?
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users