[gmx-users] Heavy metals parameterisation
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Tue Apr 11 15:05:01 CEST 2017
On 4/11/17 8:59 AM, Alex Mathew wrote:
> I'm looking something like this
>
> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2856166/
>
> Here the mercury bind to Cys residue and inhibiting the channel.
>
I suggest following a similar method to develop force field parameters, but
consistent with CHARMM, not AMBER (they use different QM approaches). But note
that transition metals cause lots of problems in QM; some DFT methods work
better than MP2. I'm working on some of this for our polarizable force field
and it is a major pain to find a consistent model chemistry that's both
sufficiently accurate and applicable to multiple ions.
-Justin
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
http://mackerell.umaryland.edu/~jalemkul
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list