[gmx-users] Problem with area per lipid

Sheikh Imamul Hossain s.imamul.ku at gmail.com
Wed Apr 19 03:02:01 CEST 2017


Hi all,
I am trying to backmap some atomistic lipids ( CHARMM36 ) to CG like POPC
using backward.py. I am just wondering it creates 13 CG lipids (below)
which match the old martini lipid itp file

    1POPC   NC3    1   0.240  -0.203   1.929
    1POPC   PO4    2   0.051  -0.284   1.824
    1POPC   GL1    3  -0.199  -0.211   1.765
    1POPC   GL2    4  -0.025  -0.035   1.685
    1POPC   C1A    5   0.116  -0.225   1.328
    1POPC   C2A    6   0.243  -0.190   0.882
    1POPC   C3A    7   0.155  -0.049   0.615
    1POPC   C4A    8   0.037  -0.006   0.356
    1POPC   C1B    9  -0.288  -0.416   1.460
    1POPC   C2B   10  -0.158  -0.622   1.286
    1POPC   D3B   11  -0.231  -0.559   0.992
    1POPC   C4B   12  -0.187  -0.462   0.639
    1POPC   C5B   13  -0.204  -0.485   0.356

But the new martini_lipid itp file contains 12 CG lipids. Insane.py create
12 CG lipids for POPC and also for POPG.
In this situation, I have tried both ways to get the area per lipid at
surface tension 0 mN/m and 20 mN/m of 1024 DPPC+POPC lipids (512 lipids
each layer). I have used nearly 14000 CG water between two lipids
monolayers. The area per lipid I got  is 0.5593nm2 and 0.5978nm2 for 0 and
20mN/m surface tension respectively. Temperature for both cases is 310K. As
far I know at 0 surface tension the area per lipid must be lower than
0.50nm2.

How can I address this problem?

N.B. I got the area per lipid nearly 0.474 nm2 and 0.584 nm2  at 0 and 20
mN/m surface tension respectively using same mdp file and other conditions
as mentioned above for only 1024 DPPC lipids. This result correlates with
the experimental results.


Sincerely Your’s
Sheikh Imamul Hossain
PhD Student at QUT


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list