[gmx-users] Can I used slipids.ff + charmm36.ff to create a system?
carlos.navarro87 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 22 15:27:50 CEST 2017
Dear gmx users,
I’m trying to set up a system consisting in a protein embebed into a
bilayer. The whole system contains approximately ~400000 atoms, so to speed
up the simulation I'm using virtual sites.
I had no issue by converting my initial structure (protein) into a .gro+vs
And for the lipid coordinates and parameters I’m using the one published in
the following article:
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdfplus/10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01202 files here->
https://zenodo.org/record/47649#.WZssiHeGMcg (In the link are the
parameters for POPC, as well as the ffbonded and ffnonbonded for the slipid
Unfortunately, since the lipids posses its own forcefield file (located in
slipids.ff) I don’t how how to include the parameters in the ‘main’
topology file, because if I do add the slipid forcefield in I get the
Syntax error - File forcefield.itp, line 5
Last line read:
'1 2 yes 0.5000 0.8333'
Found a second defaults directive.
error, which make sense.
But also If I tried to add only the .itp file of POPCvs to the .top file
gromacs complain about the atomtypes:
ERROR 1 [file POPCvs.itp, line 66]:
Atomtype MCH3N not found
If I’m not mistaken, I have read some articles were people indeed can
combine different forcefield, but sadly I don’t know how to do that.
If this is imposible to do, does someone know vsite parameters for POPC
that can be use in charmm36?
Hope someone can help me.
Carlos Navarro Retamal
Bioinformatic Engineering. PhD
Postdoctoral Researcher in Center for Bioinformatics and Molecular
Universidad de Talca
Av. Lircay S/N, Talca, Chile
T: (+56) 712201 <//T: (+56) 712201> 798
E: carlos.navarro87 at gmail.com or cnavarro at utalca.cl
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users