[gmx-users] Post-analysis of residue residue interactions
Mark Abraham
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Fri Feb 3 14:19:00 CET 2017
Hi,
You can have more than one energy-group pair-of-interest per rerun. That
will compute more pairwise combinations that are not of interest, requiring
more sophisticated use of gmx energy, but this will run a lot faster than
the I/O you're saving. e.g.
energygrps = A ResInter1 ResInter2 ... ResInterN for some chunk size of N
distinct residues of B.
IIRC there's a cap of 64 energy groups because of how they were used in the
implementation of the old group scheme.
Mark
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 2:41 PM CROUZY Serge 119222 <serge.crouzy at cea.fr>
wrote:
>
> Dear gromacs users
>
> We've run umbrella sampling simulations (with pull) of proteinA/ProteinB
> dimer turning into two separate monomers
> We have 25 simulation windows each of 10 ns MD (1000 frames) and proteins
> containing 132 residues
> We now want to calculate interaction energy (VDW Elec) between each residu
> of B (1 by 1) and all residues of A (as a whole) to understand which
> residues most contribute to the PMF
>
> The way we do that is described below :
> for (( f=0; f<=25; f++ )) (all frames)
> for (( res =1; res<=132; res++ )) (all residues)
> make_ndx ResInter define residue number
> in B : Resinter
> gmx_mpi grompp build tpr define new
> energy groups energygrps = A ResInter
> mpirun -np 8 gmx_mpi mdrun -rerun umbrella$f.xtc rerun
> dynamics on the 1000 frames
> g_energy average energy
> between Resinter and total A protein
> done
> done
>
> that's 25*132*1000 = 33 10⁵ energy calculations and particularly time
> consuming 132*25 = 3300 times rereading
> the trajectories
>
> I was wondering is there a more efficient way to do this ? For instance
> reading each trajectory only once instead of 132 times
> That's basically exchanging loop order
> for (( f=0; f<=25; f++ )) (all frames)
> mpirun -np 8 gmx_mpi mdrun -rerun umbrella$f.xtc
> for (( res =1; res<=132; res++ ))
> g_energy
> done
> done
> but this does not seem possible because the interacting groups have to be
> defined before calling md rerun
>
> Any idea would be greatly appreciated
>
> Thanx
>
> Serge Crouzy
>
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list