[gmx-users] about potential energy calculation
Anders Støttrup Larsen
anders.sl at gmail.com
Fri Jan 13 12:23:45 CET 2017
Do you have the same amount of molecules in each simulation?
Anders
On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 12:19 PM, Albert <mailmd2011 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Mark.
>
> thanks a lot for your comments.
>
> These two peptides are isomers.
>
> I want to know which conformations is more favourable than the other from
> the aspect of potential energy.....
>
> However, the system potential energy and the peptide potential energy
> seems to be inconsistent with each other.... So I am pretty confused right
> now....
>
> regards
>
>
>
> On 01/13/2017 12:16 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Having low potential energy (whether in dynamical simulation or em) and
>> being (any kind of) stable are nearly unrelated concepts. There may be a
>> way to measure what you want, but so far I suspect you haven't worked out
>> a
>> good way to describe what you want.
>>
>> Further, unless your peptides are isomers, your potential energies are of
>> systems with different composition, so can't be compared.
>>
>> Mark
>>
>
>
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support
> /Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list