[gmx-users] dihedral MM scan
Mohsen Ramezanpour
ramezanpour.mohsen at gmail.com
Thu Jan 19 03:51:14 CET 2017
Dear Gromacs users,
I want to do a MM scan on a dihedral and compare with the available QM
profile using Gromacs 5.1.3
I used the following (updated compared to my last email on parameters)
em.mdp and md.mdp files for relaxation and zero-step md, respectively.
*em.mdp:*
define = -DPOSRESDIH
integrator = steep
emtol = 100.0
nsteps = 50000
vdwtype = Cut-off
vdw-modifier = none
coulombtype = Cut-off
constraints = h-bonds
constraint_algorithm = LINCS
nstlist = 0
ns-type = simple
pbc = no
cutoff-scheme = group
rcoulomb = 0
rvdw = 0
rvdw_switch = 0
rlist = 0
Which, by -DPOSRES I am applying position restraint on specific dihedral of
interest.
The following lines were included at the end of molecule.itp
#ifdef POSRES
[ dihedral_restraints ]
1 18 8 9 1 120 0 10000
#endif
*as for md.mdp:*
define =
integrator = md
dt = 0.001
nsteps = 0
nstlog = 0
nstxout = 0
nstvout = 0
nstfout = 0
nstcalcenergy = 0
nstenergy = 0
nstxout-compressed = 100000
compressed-x-precision = 1000
coulombtype = Cut-off
vdwtype = Cut-off
vdw-modifier = none
constraints = h-bonds
constraint_algorithm = LINCS
nstcomm = 100
comm_mode = linear
comm_grps = system
refcoord_scaling = com
nstlist = 0
ns-type = simple
pbc = no
cutoff-scheme = group
rcoulomb = 0
rvdw = 0
rvdw_switch = 0
rlist = 0
continuation = yes
It seems to work fine, at least because grompp do not complain and it gives
me the desired files.
There is one problem:
Looking at the Potential Energy which zero-step md for angle = 120 gives me
a value of 384.682 KJ/mol (ca. 91 Kcal/mol) which is almost 20 times the
value from QM profile (4.5 Kcal/mol) by GAAMP server (as I understood, the
units for dihedral profiles by GAAMP are in Kcal/mol).
I used the parameters GAAMP gave me (partial charges and dihedral
parameters).
Briefly, the same molecule which I uploaded to GAAMP was used for MM scan
in vaccume. No box and infinite cutoff was used. I did an EM step by above
em.mdp and let the system to relax. Then, I removed the restraints and did
the zero-step md part and got this energy.
It is worth mentioning that the molecule is positively charges. BUT, as I
understood, this is what GAAMP also uses for the QM scan.
What could be the problem?
I highly appreciate your comments as expert in this.
Cheers
Mohsen
--
*Rewards work better than punishment ...*
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list