[gmx-users] Issue with the PDB generated after topology
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Mon Jul 3 13:35:56 CEST 2017
Sure, they're all just labels. If you wanted to look at the heights of the
girls in a family and the heights of boys in the same family, sorted by
age, then e.g. boy 2 could easily be child 5... You just need to think
about simulation residue number differently from input residue number.
Neither "should" be used - but each is convenient for a different purpose.
On Mon, Jul 3, 2017 at 1:31 PM Khadija Amine <kh.amine1 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thank you, Mark.
> I understand from your suggestion, that what I got from topology and
> solvation phases is correct, and MD simulations even if it affects the
> numbering of the structure but the simulation results remain unaffected and
> I could renumber my residues at the end of simulation as it should be.
> This the first time I'm facing this case as it's the first time I'm running
> MD simulation of a protein complex.
> *Khadija Amine*
> Ph.D. Biology and Health
> Biochemistry & Bioinformatics
> Phone: 33339584
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users