[gmx-users] protein protein interaction: side chain contribution
Tushar Ranjan Moharana
tusharranjanmoharana at gmail.com
Mon Jul 10 07:50:37 CEST 2017
Hi Justin,
Thanks a lot for the valuable advice.
"A society with free knowledge is better than a society with free food"
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Tushar Ranjan Moharana <
tusharranjanmoharana at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Justin,
> Thanks a lot for the advice. It looks like I had put one atom in the wrong
> index group. After correction my results looks as follows:
>
> Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------
> Coul-SR:161TYR-161TYR_com -75.0549 1.7 17.8261 8.26634
> (kJ/mol)
> LJ-SR:161TYR-161TYR_com -47.9464 1.5 10.2566 2.55572
> (kJ/mol)
> Coul-14:161TYR-161TYR_com 0 0 0 0
> (kJ/mol)
> LJ-14:161TYR-161TYR_com 0 0 0 0
> (kJ/mol)
>
> I think it should be fine as the result didn't change much (other than the
> LJ-14).
>
> As per your suggestion, calculation of kinetic energy by gmx traj or
> energy(after saving only desired atoms in the trajectory) are not
> meaningful. Is there any way to compute it?
>
> Thanks a lot for your time and effort.
>
>
> "A society with free knowledge is better than a society with free food"
> --
> Tushar Ranjan Moharana
> B. Tech, NIT Warangal
> Ph D Student, CCMB
>
--
Tushar Ranjan Moharana
B. Tech, NIT Warangal
Ph D Student, CCMB
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list