[gmx-users] Concrete pull code explanation needed
jalemkul at vt.edu
Tue Jul 11 19:02:31 CEST 2017
On 7/10/17 11:19 PM, Du, Yu wrote:
> Dear Justin and gmx users,
> I have gone through mdp-option and Justin A. Lemkul's COM pulling tutorial serveral times.
> The following is Justin's pull code.
> ; Pull code
> pull = yes
> pull_ngroups = 2
> pull_ncoords = 1
> pull_group1_name = Chain_B
> pull_group2_name = Chain_A
> pull_coord1_type = umbrella ; harmonic biasing force
> pull_coord1_geometry = distance ; simple distance increase
> pull_coord1_groups= 1 2
> pull_coord1_dim = N N Y
> pull_coord1_rate = 0.01 ; 0.01 nm per ps = 10 nm per ns
> pull_coord1_k = 1000 ; kJ mol^-1 nm^-2
> pull_coord1_start = yes ; define initial COM distance > 0
> My understanding lists as follows,
> Justin defines two pull groups, with `pull-ngroups = 2`, each of them has a name in the index.ndx generated by `gmx make_ndx -f npt.gro`and their names are defined by `pull_group1_name = Chain_B` and `pull_group2_name = Chain_A`.
> My question is about the definition of pulling coordination and the orientation of pulling force.
> 1) I learnt from [gmx-users] Change to umbrella sampling pull code，
> "You need: pull-coord1-groups = 1 2 otherwise the reaction coordinate is undefined, or otherwise defaults to the entire system, I can't remember which. -Justin"
> I know it's a plot :) in the input.pdb that proteins are placed exquisitely along the z-axis which is the same as the pulling coordinate but it makes pull code confused and here I need a concrete explanation.
> 1.The pull coordinate is the line that connects COM of group1 and group2 with `pull_coord1_groups= 1 2`.
> OR 2. The pull coordinate is the z axis with `pull_coord1_dim = N N Y`.
> Which is correct?
The z-component of the vector connecting the COMs of the two groups.
> 2)Then turn to the orientation of pulling forces.
> My understanding is that force1 acts on pull_group1, force2 acts on pull_group2 and the orientation of force 1 and 2 is opposite, both forces have a rate of 10nm per ns.
> Is my understanding and the below schematic draw right?
There is one force. It acts on the spring connecting the two groups.
> The last question is about the umbrella sampling.
> I learnt from [gmx-users] Re: doubt about your Umbrella Sampling tutorial that it's ok to remove the pores of Chain B during the US. But in longer simulation time and in the periodical box, will the COM of Chain B and A be affacted by the boundary? and then affact the calculation of US potential?
The tutorial system won't work if you turn off the restraint. Eventually the
system will rotate and the groups will cross periodic boundaries, which will
cause the chosen pull geometry to fail. So the restraints serve a dual purpose:
(1) to mimic the stability of larger amyloid assemblies and (2) to reduce the
system size, as several hundred thousand atoms was not feasible for me at the time.
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Ruth L. Kirschstein NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow
Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences
School of Pharmacy
Health Sciences Facility II, Room 629
University of Maryland, Baltimore
20 Penn St.
Baltimore, MD 21201
jalemkul at outerbanks.umaryland.edu | (410) 706-7441
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users