[gmx-users] Regarding the charge of the atom in the .rtp file
Dilip H N
cy16f01.dilip at nitk.edu.in
Thu Jun 22 17:23:09 CEST 2017
No, its not related to parameterization methodology. it is a different
question...
how can i identify the molecule as methylamine (for example) since in the
.rtp the molecule type is written as [MAM1]
[ MAM1 ]
[ atoms ]
N1 NG321 -0.990 0
C1 CG3AM2 -0.060 1
HN1 HGPAM2 0.390 2
HN2 HGPAM2 0.390 3
HC1 HGAAM2 0.090 4
HC2 HGAAM2 0.090 5
HC3 HGAAM2 0.090 6
[ bonds ]
N1 C1
N1 HN1
N1 HN2
C1 HC1
C1 HC2
C1 HC3
Is thr any hint such tht i can identify the molecule type written in .rtp
file.??
Or should i manually find it out..??... but in case of Glycine the molecule
type is [GLY] which is easy to find....
How can i solve this issue..??
Thank you...
<https://mailtrack.io/> Sent with Mailtrack
<https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&lang=en&referral=cy16f01.dilip@nitk.edu.in&idSignature=22>
On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 4:38 PM, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't understand what you are asking. How does it relate to
> parameterization methodology?
>
> Mark
>
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 7:20 AM Dilip H N <cy16f01.dilip at nitk.edu.in>
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you for reply..
> >
> > But how can i identify the molecule as methylamine (for example) since in
> > the .rtp the molecule type is written as [MAM1]
> > [ MAM1 ]
> > [ atoms ]
> > N1 NG321 -0.990 0
> > C1 CG3AM2 -0.060 1
> > HN1 HGPAM2 0.390 2
> > HN2 HGPAM2 0.390 3
> > HC1 HGAAM2 0.090 4
> > HC2 HGAAM2 0.090 5
> > HC3 HGAAM2 0.090 6
> > [ bonds ]
> > N1 C1
> > N1 HN1
> > N1 HN2
> > C1 HC1
> > C1 HC2
> > C1 HC3
> > Is thr any hint such tht i can identify the molecule type written in .rtp
> > file.??
> > Or should i manually find it out..??... but in case of Glycine the
> molecule
> > type is [GLY] which is easy to find....
> > How can i solve this issue..??
> >
> > Thank you...
> >
> >
> >
> > <https://mailtrack.io/> Sent with Mailtrack
> > <
> > https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&lang=en&
> referral=cy16f01.dilip at nitk.edu.in&idSignature=22
> > >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 4:23 PM, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:59 AM Dilip H N <cy16f01.dilip at nitk.edu.in>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hello all.
> > > > 1] I want to knw how the charges are designated/assigned for the each
> > > atoms
> > > > in molecule in the .rtp file. ie., as example for methylamine in
> > CHARMM
> > > > FF:-
> > > >
> > > > [ MAM1 ]
> > > > [ atoms ]
> > > > N1 NG321 -0.990 0
> > > > C1 CG3AM2 -0.060 1
> > > > HN1 HGPAM2 0.390 2
> > > > HN2 HGPAM2 0.390 3
> > > > HC1 HGAAM2 0.090 4
> > > > HC2 HGAAM2 0.090 5
> > > > HC3 HGAAM2 0.090 6
> > > > [ bonds ]
> > > > N1 C1
> > > > N1 HN1
> > > > N1 HN2
> > > > C1 HC1
> > > > C1 HC2
> > > > C1 HC3
> > > > ie how are the charges -0.990, -0.060, 0.390 etc., are assigned...
> > > >
> > >
> > > The parameterization methodology is unique to each force field, and
> > perhaps
> > > to each tool that generates compatible topologies. You need to read
> that
> > > documentation and literature to understand how they were derived.
> > >
> > >
> > > > 2] and if i get the topology/itp file from the automated topology
> > builder
> > > > as in SwissParam for CHARMM forcefield, how can i confirm that the
> > > charges
> > > > assigned are exact..??
> > > >
> > >
> > > You can see if they are correct in the sense of being a valid model of
> > > reality by running a simulation and observing whether you can get
> > > reasonable agreement with suitable e.g. experimental data.
> > >
> > > Mark
> > >
> > >
> > > > Any help/suggestion is most welcome.
> > > > Thank you...
> > > > --
> > > > With Best Regards,
> > > >
> > > > DILIP.H.N
> > > > Ph.D Student
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > <https://mailtrack.io/> Sent with Mailtrack
> > > > <
> > > > https://mailtrack.io/install?source=signature&lang=en&
> > > referral=cy16f01.dilip at nitk.edu.in&idSignature=22
> > > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > > >
> > > > * Please search the archive at
> > > > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > > > posting!
> > > >
> > > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > > >
> > > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users
> or
> > > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > > >
> > > --
> > > Gromacs Users mailing list
> > >
> > > * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
> > > Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> > >
> > > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> > >
> > > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > With Best Regards,
> >
> > DILIP.H.N
> > Ph.D Student
> > --
> > Gromacs Users mailing list
> >
> > * Please search the archive at
> > http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> > posting!
> >
> > * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> >
> > * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> > https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> > send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
> >
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
> Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
>
--
With Best Regards,
DILIP.H.N
Ph.D Student
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list