[gmx-users] mobile ligand with intermolecular interactions
Ahmet Yildirim
ahmedo047 at gmail.com
Fri Nov 10 20:21:53 CET 2017
Dear users,
I add the following [ intermolecular_interactions ] section into the
topology file of protein-ligand complex for free energy calculations.
Unfortunately this setting doesn't provide me what I want in the decoupled
state. The ligand in the decoupled state is very mobile compared to the
coupled state. It means that the conformational sampling of the ligand in
the decoupled state is quite different from the coupled state. That is not
expected of course. Any suggestions as to why this might be?
Do you think that there is something wrong with the following settings,
e.g. [ dihedrals ] part?
[ intermolecular_interactions ]
[ bonds ]
; ai aj type bA kA bB kB
1391 2615 6 0.654 0.0 0.654 4184.0
[ angles ]
; ai aj ak type thA fcA thB fcB
1393 1391 2615 1 88.8 0.0 88.8 41.84
1391 2615 2614 1 32.9 0.0 32.9 41.84
[ dihedrals ]
; ai aj ak al type thA fcA thB fcB
1410 1393 1391 2615 2 -159.7 0.0 -159.7 41.84
1393 1391 2615 2614 2 122.6 0.0 122.6 41.84
1391 2615 2614 2610 2 12.8 0.0 12.8 41.84
Should I use the following [ dihedral_restraints ] part instead of the
above [ dihedrals ] part?
[ dihedral_restraints ]
; ai aj ak al type phiA dphiA fcA phiB dphiB
fcB
1410 1393 1391 2615 1 -159.7 0.0 0.0 -159.7 0.0
41.84
1393 1391 2615 2614 1 122.6 0.0 0.0 122.6 0.0
41.84
1393 1391 2615 2614 1 12.8 0.0 0.0 12.8 0.0
41.84
I think [ dihedral_restraints ] will be the same as [ dihedrals ] because
the eq. 4.84 in the manual will be equal to 4.61 if dphiA and dphiB are
taken as 0 (zero), right?
Thanks in advance
--
Ahmet Yildirim
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list