[gmx-users] g_sans calculation

João Henriques joao.m.a.henriques at gmail.com
Fri Feb 23 21:48:42 CET 2018

I understand your pain, and the same could be said about gmx saxs as well.
As Micholas said, CRYSON might be a good choice as far as implicit solvent
methods go. Please notice that CRYSON is closed source, but it is well
documented in the literature (it is basically a reimplementation of

*Svergun, D., Barberato, C., & Koch, M. H. (1995). J. Appl. Crystallogr.,
28(6), 768-773


On Fri, Feb 23, 2018 at 9:14 PM, Udaya Dahal <dahal.udaya at gmail.com> wrote:

>  Dear Gromacs Users,
> I am calculating the g_sans in the simulation but I am not able to find how
> it is calculated. The help content is minimal. I am just wondering if
> anyone has looked into how it is calculated (any reference to algorithm?).
> Regards,
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/
> Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.

More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list