[gmx-users] Positive potential energy
Mahsa E
ebadi.mahsa at gmail.com
Fri Feb 23 23:27:59 CET 2018
Hello,
I want to simulate a box of polymer (32 chains) with salt. I started with
one chain of the polymer in the box. However, after the energy
minimisation, the energy is still positive. I found the discussion in the
link below very similar to the problem I have:
https://mailman-1.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-users
/2017-February/111219.html
and tried the tips from Justin in the link but I still get positive energy.
This is my first MDP file:
define =
integrator = steep
nsteps = -1
nstcgsteep = 10
constraints = none
lincs_order = 8
emtol = 20
emstep = 0.01
comm-mode = Linear
nstcomm = 1
nstcalcenergy = 1
; Output frequency for energies to log file and energy file
nstlog = 1
nstenergy = 1
ns_type = grid
cutoff-scheme = verlet
coulombtype = PME
nstlist = 10
rlist = 1.0
rcoulomb = 1.0
rvdw = 1.0
Tcoupl = no
Pcoupl = no
gen_vel = no
nstxout = 1
pbc = xyz
and this is the second one which I tried to follow the tips from the link
mentioned above:
define =
integrator = steep
nsteps = -1
nstcgsteep = 10
constraints = none
lincs_order = 8
emtol = 20
emstep = 0.01
comm-mode = Linear
nstcomm = 1
nstcalcenergy = 1
; Output frequency for energies to log file and energy file
nstlog = 1
nstenergy = 1
ns_type = grid
cutoff-scheme = group
coulombtype = cut-off
nstlist = 0
rlist = 0
rcoulomb = 0
rvdw = 0
Tcoupl = no
Pcoupl = no
gen_vel = no
nstxout = 1
pbc = no
My questions are:
- I'm not sure if either of these MDP files are correct for the system I'm
trying to simulate?
- Why energy is positive in this simulation? Is there something
fundamentally wrong in the simulation which I'm not aware of?
Regards,
Mahsa
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list