[gmx-users] Energy decomposition
Vito GENNA
vito.genna at irbbarcelona.org
Sun Jul 8 20:22:29 CEST 2018
Dear Justin,
Thanks a lot.
I indeed did not consider the idea to extrapolate only a part of the whole trajectory. Nice shot.
Well, regarding the forcefield, this calculation in part is aiming to a kind of “ff validation”.
Thanks a lot for your prompt reply.
V
Vito Genna, Ph.D
PostDoctoral Researcher
Molecular Modelling and Bioinformatics
Orozco Lab
Dep. of Structural and Computational Biology
Institute for Research in Biomedicine (IRB Barcelona)
Parc Científic de Barcelona
C/ Baldiri Reixac 10-12
08028 Barcelona
P.S. This message has been written with my IPhone. Sorry for typo.
> Il giorno 08 lug 2018, alle ore 20:12, Justin Lemkul <jalemkul at vt.edu> ha scritto:
>
>
>
>> On 7/8/18 2:06 PM, Vito GENNA wrote:
>> Dear GMXusers,
>>
>> I am writing you in the hope to find a solution to my problem.
>>
>> I'd love (and truly love) calculate the intramolecular energy (both bonded
>> and non-bonded terms) of a DNA backbone for which I have a .xtc trajectory
>> (and of course coords).
>>
>> What I did:
>>
>> 1) defined the index.ndx for each DNA strand and generated a ndx.file
>> cotaining [strand-1] and [System - (strand-1)] (works fine)
>>
>> 2) Changed the energygrps in the mdp file to: [strand-1] [System -
>> (strand-1)] (works fine)
>>
>> 3) Generated a .tpr file selecting (from point 1) the .ndx of my interest
>>
>> 4) with mdrun with -rerun option (by using the .tpr of my interest
>> generated at the previous stage) I get the .edr file [strand-1]
>>
>> 5) by using g_energy I only get Lennard-Jones and Coulomb terms (both short
>> and long for [strand-1]:[strand-1]) while I would also include the
>> bonded-terms.
>>
>> 6) The option ETOT, provided by g_energy, I guess does not return the E of
>> the strand, rather of the overall system. Isn't it?
>>
>> Since I am comparing the same system in different conditions (then in
>> different MD) I am looking for a strategy which would allow me to
>> extrapolate all the energy terms for the backbone in a consistent fashion.
>>
>> Did you ever calculated something similar?
>> If so, how?
>
> You need to extract only the coordinates you want from the trajectory with trjconv and your index group. Then, create a matching .tpr file with only those atoms using convert-tpr. Then use mdrun -rerun. Whether or not the quantity means anything depends on how your force field was parametrized, but that's how you calculate it.
>
> -Justin
>
>> If not, any suggestion?
>>
>> Thanks in advance for all your comments.
>>
>> All the Best
>>
>> VG
>>
>> PS: Gromacs version: 5.0.4
>>
>
> --
> ==================================================
>
> Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
> Assistant Professor
> Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry
>
> 303 Engel Hall
> 340 West Campus Dr.
> Blacksburg, VA 24061
>
> jalemkul at vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
> http://www.thelemkullab.com
>
> ==================================================
>
> --
> Gromacs Users mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list