[gmx-users] Fwd: different vectors from gmx covar and gmx anaeig
Qinghua Liao
scorpio.liao at gmail.com
Thu Oct 18 18:42:09 CEST 2018
Hello,
I found out what's going on there, the first set data is the total
vector, which I thought was
the X component. Thanks!
All the best,
Qinghua
-------- Forwarded Message -------
Subject: different vectors from gmx covar and gmx anaeig
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2018 13:30:13 +0200
From: Qinghua Liao <scorpio.liao at gmail.com>
To: gromacs.org_gmx-users at maillist.sys.kth.se
Hello,
I am doing PCA analysis to characterize the motion of a domain, I got
the files:
average.pdb
eigenval.xvg
eigenvec.trr
covar.log
Then, with "gmx trjconv -f eigenvec.trr -s average.pdb -o eigenvec.pdb",
I got all the vectors in the pdb file "eigenvec.pdb"
I also used "gmx anaeig -v eigenvec.trr -eig eigenval.xvg -first 1 -last
2 -comp eigcomp.xvg " to get the first two vectors component
in "eigcomp.xvg"
I compared the vectors generated with the two commands, and I found that
they are different.
For example, for the first vector (only the first three atoms are listed),
"eigenvec.pdb":
x y z
ATOM 1 N LYS 1 0.090 0.749 -0.555 1.00
0.00 N
ATOM 2 CA LYS 1 0.142 0.704 -0.532 1.00
0.00 C
ATOM 3 C LYS 1 0.111 0.653 -0.487 1.00
0.00 C
"eigcomp.xvg":
x
1.0000 0.09367
2.0000 0.08940
3.0000 0.08218
y
1.0000 0.00905
2.0000 0.01424
3.0000 0.01114
z
1.0000 0.07494
2.0000 0.07042
3.0000 0.06526
I guess the unit is nm for both cases. Then how should I interpret this
differences, did I do something wrong? Thanks a lot!
All the best,
Qinghua
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list