[gmx-users] i have queston about partial charge zinc

Andrea Coletta andrea.coletta at chem.au.dk
Thu Sep 20 14:57:03 CEST 2018

In general I would say that +2 is not a good choice, since it seems to me that this is a Zinc complex.

You may want to look at this: 


you should be able to create the topology in ambertools and then convert it to gromac with acpype (https://github.com/llazzaro/acpype) 

-----Original Message-----
From: gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se [mailto:gromacs.org_gmx-users-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se] On Behalf Of milad bagheri
Sent: 20. september 2018 14:28
To: gromacs.org_gmx-users at maillist.sys.kth.se
Subject: [gmx-users] i have queston about partial charge zinc

I gonna MD simulation a protein that contained a zinc ion for build topology I used from the amber99sb  force field Atomic charge is written "+2" in topology.
I wanted to ask if this charge is correct or should be calculated in a different way?
"PDB id 4row"
Gromacs Users mailing list

* Please search the archive at http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before posting!

* Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists

* For (un)subscribe requests visit
https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.

More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users mailing list