[gmx-users] energy minimization
Dhrubajyoti Maji
dmaji43 at gmail.com
Tue Aug 27 18:50:31 CEST 2019
Dear gromacs users,
I am doing energy minimization of a neat urea system. When I set emtol =
10 the following result is obtained :
Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 33995 steps,
but did not reach the requested Fmax < 10.
Potential Energy = 6.7910172e+04
Maximum force = 7.8070724e+01 on atom 353
Norm of force = 3.1714432e+00
and average energy is
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Potential 72421.6 2500 14229.1 -16147.4
(kJ/mol)
And when I set emtol=100 the following result is obtained :
Steepest Descents converged to Fmax < 100 in 12573 steps
Potential Energy = 7.1502609e+04
Maximum force = 8.5925835e+01 on atom 2713
Norm of force = 5.0333209e+00
and average energy is
Energy Average Err.Est. RMSD Tot-Drift
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Potential 77654.4 3600 22408.3 -22901.6
(kJ/mol)
In both cases the energy is well converged but not less than zero. Does
only convergence of potential energy (not negative) guarantee the
completion of EM process ? If so then what emtol value should I use ?
Any help will be highly appreciated. Thanks for your time.
Best regards
Dhrubajyoti Maji
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list