[gmx-users] Minimization stops without reaching the requested precision Fmax < 1000
Mahdi Bagherpoor
mehdi.bpour at gmail.com
Mon Jun 24 20:03:24 CEST 2019
Dear Gromacs Users,
I am trying to add the tethrahedral zinc atom dummy model into CHARMM36
force field in Gromacs. In my system, this dummy zinc interact with four
Cystein residues (CYM). The parameters of the zinc are available in CHARMM
format, which I used to use it in NAMD package. After adding appropriate
parameters, when I do energy minimization, I get this error:
========================
Energy minimization has stopped, but the forces have not converged to the
requested precision Fmax < 1000 (which may not be possible for your system).
...
Steepest Descents converged to machine precision in 1045 steps,
but did not reach the requested Fmax < 1000.
Potential Energy = -1.5922652e+06
Maximum force = 3.2106902e+07 on atom 3526
Norm of force = 1.4857810e+05
============================
Atom 3526 is dummy atom of zinc ion. The dummy parameters added in
ffbonded.itp file are:
---------- ffbonded.itp
;zinc dummy model, bonds
HK ZD 1 0.09000000 451872.00
HK HK 1 0.14700000 451872.00
;zinc dummy model, angles
HK ZD HK 5 109.500000 460.240000 0.00000000
0.00
HK HK HK 5 60.000000 460.240000 0.00000000
0.00
HK HK ZD 5 35.250000 460.240000 0.00000000
0.00
;zinc dummy model, dihedrals
ZD HK HK HK 9 35.300000 0.000000 2
HK ZD HK HK 9 120.000000 0.000000 2
HK HK HK HK 9 70.000000 0.000000 2
----------- ffnonbonded.itp
;zinc dummy model
ZD 30 61.380000 0.000 A 0.310000000000 0.00001
HK 1 1.008000 0.500 A 0.000000000000 0.00000
=================================================
In contrast to Gromacs, when I do minimization in NAMD, there is no such an
error in minimization. I should mention that I am using single precision
platform of Gromacs.
I would appreciate if you could share me in case you have some ideas about
this problem.
Cheers,
Mahdi
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list