[gmx-users] Parrinello-Rahman vs. Nose-Hoover
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Wed May 29 00:51:56 CEST 2019
Why should it be used? :-)
On Tue, 28 May 2019 at 23:28, Anh Vo <atv55 at msstate.edu> wrote:
> Hi all,
> In GROMACS Manual, it is said that "In most cases Parrinello-Rahman
> barostat would be combined with the Nose-Hoover thermostat as the most
> practical choice", and I see that Nose-Hoover algorithm is only available
> for temperature coupling, not pressure coupling. Why is Nose-Hoover not
> used for pressure coupling in GROMACS?
> Thank you very much.
> Best regards,
> Anh Vo
> Gromacs Users mailing list
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-Users_List before
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-users or
> send a mail to gmx-users-request at gromacs.org.
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users