[gmx-users] Fwd: geometry optimization of metalloenzyme
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Thu Apr 2 21:26:37 CEST 2020
On 4/2/20 3:23 PM, Nadia Elghobashi-Meinhardt wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am trying to minimize the potential energy of a
> metalloenzyme containing Ni and Fe atoms.
> What is the best way to constrain (fix?) the position of the active site
> atoms
> during the geometry optimization?
> I have tried introducing bonds with relatively high force constants and
> alternatively, tried introducing a [constraints] section,
> but the atoms are still not staying put.
Bonds or constraints will maintain distances between atoms (relative
position) but not absolute position.
> Or should one use extra position restraints?
If the absolute position matters, yes. I would think the approach of
adding restraints or constraints between atoms would be more meaningful
given that preserving coordination geometry is often the defect in MM
treatment of transition metals.
-Justin
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Office: 301 Fralin Hall
Lab: 303 Engel Hall
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry
340 West Campus Dr.
Blacksburg, VA 24061
jalemkul at vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
http://www.thelemkullab.com
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list