[gmx-users] Invalid atomtype format
Justin Lemkul
jalemkul at vt.edu
Wed Apr 29 18:30:59 CEST 2020
On 4/28/20 11:52 AM, Sadaf Rani wrote:
> Dear Gromacs users
> I am facing a problem between different versions of gromacs for gmx
> pdb2gmx. I have a protein-ligand system, I did all the necessary steps
> mentioned in gromacs manual for adding new residue to force field. When I
> run this in gromacs 2019 it gives me a warning as below:-
> Fatal error:
> Invalid atomtype format: ''
> But it still generates a gro file and topology. But When I am using gromacs
> 2020, I get the same message of invalid atomtype format as below:-
>
> Reading 78I-T.pdb...
> WARNING: all CONECT records are ignored
> Read '', 4083 atoms
> Analyzing pdb file
> Splitting chemical chains based on TER records or chain id changing.
> WARNING: Chain identifier 'A' is used in two non-sequential blocks.
> They will be treated as separate chains unless you reorder your file.
> There are 2 chains and 0 blocks of water and 492 residues with 4083 atoms
>
> chain #res #atoms
> 1 'A' 489 3971
> 2 'A' 3 112
>
> All occupancies are one
> Opening force field file ./amber99sb-ildn.ff/atomtypes.atp
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> Program: gmx pdb2gmx, version 2020-UNCHECKED
> Source file: src/gromacs/gmxpreprocess/resall.cpp (line 98)
>
> Fatal error:
> *Invalid atomtype format: ''*
>
> I am unable to sort out this problem.
> I have added the atom types of my molecule as mentioned:-
>
> ;[ atomtypes ]
> ; name bond_type mass charge ptype sigma eps
> nh 14.01000 0.000 A 3.25000e-1 7.11280e-1
> hn 1.00800 0.000 A 1.06908e-1 6.56888e-2
> ca 12.01000 0.000 A 3.39967e-1 3.59824e-1
> nb 14.01000 0.000 A 3.25000e-1 7.11280e-1
> h5 1.00800 0.000 A 2.42146e-1 6.27600e-2
> nc 14.01000 0.000 A 3.25000e-1 7.11280e-1
> cd 12.01000 0.000 A 3.39967e-1 3.59824e-1
> na 14.01000 0.000 A 3.25000e-1 7.11280e-1
> c3 12.01000 0.000 A 3.39967e-1 4.57730e-1
> h2 1.00800 0.000 A 2.29317e-1 6.56888e-2
> os 16.00000 0.000 A 3.00001e-1 7.11280e-1
> h1 1.00800 0.000 A 2.47135e-1 6.56888e-2
> p5 30.97000 0.000 A 3.74177e-1 8.36800e-1
> o 16.00000 0.000 A 2.95992e-1 8.78640e-1
> oh 16.00000 0.000 A 3.06647e-1 8.80314e-1
> ho 1.00800 0.000 A 0.00000e+0 0.00000e+0
> h4 1.00800 0.000 A 2.51055e-1 6.27600e-2
> c 12.01000 0.000 A 3.39967e-1 3.59824e-1
> n 14.01000 0.000 A 3.25000e-1 7.11280e-1
> ha 1.00800 0.000 A 2.59964e-1 6.27600e-2
>
> Could you please help me to sort out this problem. Even when the format is
> incorrect does it mean that gromacs 2019 is generating a wrong topology?
You should upload a complete test case (including all force field files
and your PDB structure) somewhere so that we can take a look at it. This
is a weird error to try to debug. Make sure you're only ever using a
plain-text editor like VIM or Emacs to avoid inclusion of inappropriate
characters.
-Justin
--
==================================================
Justin A. Lemkul, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Office: 301 Fralin Hall
Lab: 303 Engel Hall
Virginia Tech Department of Biochemistry
340 West Campus Dr.
Blacksburg, VA 24061
jalemkul at vt.edu | (540) 231-3129
http://www.thelemkullab.com
==================================================
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list