[gmx-users] Protein pore collapse during simulation.
Yogesh Sharma
yogesh.rma13 at gmail.com
Sat Feb 1 11:05:34 CET 2020
sir,
in efforts to find out the differences in the density of bilayers
generated by charmm and gromac(berger lipids) i used grid-mat. there are
significant differences in area per lipid.
with these settings for both systems:
override_vectors 5.2,10.0,6.9
grid 20
conserve_ratio yes
protein yes
precision 1.3
P_value 5.0
#Lower Z limit: 3.036 Upper Z limit: 7.784
charmm with hydrogen (sq. A)
area per lipid upper leaflet: 10.5
area per lipid bottom leaflet 5.45
charmm (bilayer saved without hydrogen) (sq. A)
area per lipid upper leaflet: 13
area per lipid bottom leaflet 7
gromac (sq. A)
area per lipid upper leaflet: 70
area per lipid bottom leaflet 68
Are charmm values below experimental observation for POPC i.e gelation of
bilayer?
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list