[gmx-users] how to fix error: Some of these results violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics
Paul bauer
paul.bauer.q at gmail.com
Fri Feb 14 08:32:41 CET 2020
Hello,
you'll need to check if you are properly sampling the different states
in your simulations, which should be possible by analyzing the
histograms you can get from gmx bar -oh
Otherwise you'll need to check if your simulation parameters are
realistic, as the program warns you :)
Cheers
Paul
On 13/02/2020 21:19, Sadaf Rani wrote:
> Dear Gromacs users
>
> I am doing free energy calculation of a ligand with protein. When I do gmx
> bar it gives me the following error:-
>
> Temperature: 298.15 K
>
> Detailed results in kT (see help for explanation):
>
> lam_A lam_B DG +/- s_A +/- s_B +/- stdev +/-
> 0 1 3.29 0.06 1.28 0.10 1.37 0.08 1.54 0.09
> 1 2 1.41 0.04 0.47 0.05 0.31 0.05 0.77 0.03
> 2 3 0.88 0.06 0.09 0.02 0.06 0.01 0.41 0.06
> 3 4 0.67 0.03 -0.01 0.03 -0.01 0.03 0.25 0.01
> 4 5 0.50 0.01 0.11 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.22 0.01
> 5 6 0.33 0.01 -0.04 0.01 -0.07 0.03 0.21 0.03
> 6 7 0.27 0.02 0.07 0.04 0.04 0.02 0.22 0.03
> 7 8 0.11 0.03 0.05 0.02 0.04 0.01 0.16 0.01
> 8 9 0.11 0.01 -0.09 0.02 -0.10 0.02 0.17 0.01
> 9 10 0.08 0.02 0.12 0.01 0.12 0.01 0.20 0.00
> 10 11 -0.04 0.03 -0.01 0.03 -0.01 0.03 0.18 0.01
> 11 12 -0.09 0.03 0.06 0.03 0.05 0.03 0.19 0.02
> 12 13 -0.02 0.03 -0.12 0.03 -0.12 0.03 0.23 0.01
> 13 14 -0.01 0.03 0.17 0.03 0.16 0.03 0.28 0.02
> 14 15 -0.06 0.03 -0.09 0.03 -0.09 0.03 0.25 0.01
> 15 16 -0.04 0.03 0.13 0.04 0.13 0.04 0.29 0.01
> 16 17 -0.15 0.03 0.04 0.01 0.04 0.01 0.24 0.01
> 17 18 -0.14 0.03 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.02 0.25 0.01
> 18 19 -0.07 0.03 -0.01 0.01 -0.08 0.02 0.27 0.01
> 19 20 -0.05 0.01 0.18 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.28 0.00
>
> WARNING: Some of these results violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics:
> This is can be the result of severe undersampling, or (more likely)
> there is something wrong with the simulations.
>
>
> Final results in kJ/mol:
>
> point 0 - 1, DG 8.14 +/- 0.14
> point 1 - 2, DG 3.50 +/- 0.09
> point 2 - 3, DG 2.19 +/- 0.14
> point 3 - 4, DG 1.66 +/- 0.07
> point 4 - 5, DG 1.24 +/- 0.02
> point 5 - 6, DG 0.83 +/- 0.02
> point 6 - 7, DG 0.66 +/- 0.06
> point 7 - 8, DG 0.28 +/- 0.08
> point 8 - 9, DG 0.28 +/- 0.03
> point 9 - 10, DG 0.19 +/- 0.05
> point 10 - 11, DG -0.10 +/- 0.08
> point 11 - 12, DG -0.22 +/- 0.07
> point 12 - 13, DG -0.05 +/- 0.08
> point 13 - 14, DG -0.03 +/- 0.08
> point 14 - 15, DG -0.16 +/- 0.07
> point 15 - 16, DG -0.10 +/- 0.07
> point 16 - 17, DG -0.37 +/- 0.07
> point 17 - 18, DG -0.35 +/- 0.08
> point 18 - 19, DG -0.17 +/- 0.06
> point 19 - 20, DG -0.13 +/- 0.02
>
> total 0 - 20, DG 17.29 +/- 0.47
>
>
> I have read in the link that I should not have negative entropy values in
> my simulation
> https://www.mail-archive.com/gmx-users@gromacs.org/msg55772.html.
> Can anyone please suggest me what could be wrong during my simulation and
> how should I fix it?
>
> Thank you
> Sadaf Rani
> Ph.D. visiting student
> Lancaster University
> Uk
--
Paul Bauer, PhD
GROMACS Development Manager
KTH Stockholm, SciLifeLab
0046737308594
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list