[gmx-developers] Free energy calculations in 3.3_rc1
David Evans
david.evans at ulsop.ac.uk
Fri Sep 9 11:33:01 CEST 2005
Hi,
I just tested the (single processor) 3.3_rc1 version on one
of my systems, involving perturbing a ligand in water.
I compared the results to those from identical input
files run with a CVS version checked out on 23/11/2004.
I have been experimenting with this CVS version for a while,
since I believed it to include free-energy PME loops (see previous postings
on this list).
I found significantly (100 kJ) different values of dg/dl between the two
versions,
although when you integrate across lambda the sums differ by only 1-2 kJ
(which is still significant according to my error analysis, but not by
much).
Does anyone knows why this is, and whether the 3.3_rc1 version
is likely to be more accurate? My .mdp file is below, and I can provide
any more details anyone needs.
Thanks,
Dave
cpp = /lib/cpp
;define = -DFLEX_SPC
integrator = md
nsteps = 1000000
dt = 0.002
comm_mode = linear
nstcomm = 1000
comm_grps = system
nstxout = 500000
nstvout = 500000
nstlog = 100
nstenergy = 100
nstxtcout = 2000
tcoupl = nose-hoover
tc_grps = system
tau_t = 1
ref_t = 300
gen_vel = yes
gen_temp = 300
pcoupl = berendsen
pcoupltype = isotropic
tau_p = 1
ref_p = 1
compressibility = 4.46e-5
constraints = hbonds
constraint_algorithm = lincs
coulombtype = PME
rvdw = 0.9
rlist = 0.9
rcoulomb = 0.9
fourierspacing = 0.12
pme_order = 4
ewald_rtol = 1e-5
vdwtype = cut-off
pbc = xyz
dispcorr = enerpres
free_energy = yes
init_lambda = 0.1
sc_alpha = 1.0
--
David Evans
School of Pharmacy
University of London
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list