[gmx-developers] a quick question about User defined table	potential in CVS version
    xuhui huang 
    xuhuihuang at gmail.com
       
    Sun Feb  4 09:39:19 CET 2007
    
    
  
Hi All,
I noticed that in the CVS version the second term for each potential
in the table is not f''(x) (second serivate of the function). It seems
that it has been changed to -f'(x) (the force itself). Is this
correct? Is there any other difference between table function in CVS
and 3.3.1.
Thanks
Xuhui Huang
    
    
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list