[gmx-developers] a quick question about User defined table potential in CVS version

[David van der Spoel]

xuhui huang wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I noticed that in the CVS version the second term for each potential
> in the table is not f''(x) (second serivate of the function). It seems
> that it has been changed to -f'(x) (the force itself). Is this
> correct? Is there any other difference between table function in CVS
> and 3.3.1.
> 
> 
> Thanks
> Xuhui Huang
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-developers mailing list
> gmx-developers at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www 
> interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
It is v, f, that you have to specify. If you check out the cvs manual 
you can see it. (cvs co manual).

-- 
David.
________________________________________________________________________
David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
Husargatan 3, Box 596,  	75124 Uppsala, Sweden
phone:	46 18 471 4205		fax: 46 18 511 755
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se	spoel at gromacs.org   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++