[gmx-developers] a quick question about User defined table potential in CVS version

[xuhui huang]

Thanks for the quick reply!

I will go to check out the CVS manual.

Best
Xuhui

On 2/4/07, David van der Spoel <spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se> wrote:
> xuhui huang wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I noticed that in the CVS version the second term for each potential
> > in the table is not f''(x) (second serivate of the function). It seems
> > that it has been changed to -f'(x) (the force itself). Is this
> > correct? Is there any other difference between table function in CVS
> > and 3.3.1.
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Xuhui Huang
> > _______________________________________________
> > gmx-developers mailing list
> > gmx-developers at gromacs.org
> > http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
> > Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the www
> > interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
> It is v, f, that you have to specify. If you check out the cvs manual
> you can see it. (cvs co manual).
>
> --
> David.
> ________________________________________________________________________
> David van der Spoel, PhD, Assoc. Prof., Molecular Biophysics group,
> Dept. of Cell and Molecular Biology, Uppsala University.
> Husargatan 3, Box 596,          75124 Uppsala, Sweden
> phone:  46 18 471 4205          fax: 46 18 511 755
> spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se    spoel at gromacs.org   http://folding.bmc.uu.se
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> _______________________________________________
> gmx-developers mailing list
> gmx-developers at gromacs.org
> http://www.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
>