[gmx-developers] How to name ions?

Gerrit Groenhof ggroenh at gwdg.de
Wed Jul 28 12:03:20 CEST 2010


Hi,

We can just decide on a scheme ourselves, can't we?

I propose to use

Cl (the chemical symbol) for the atomname, as this is also done for more
complex ions, like sulphate.
Cl- for the residue name, because that's what it is.
The type name we could use, in analogy to protein, chloride, so the full
name of the species.

Gerrit


Berk Hess wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While checking the last details of the Amber and Charmm force fields in
> Gromacs
> before the 4.5-beta release, I noticed naming inconsistensies.
> For an ion we have to choose the molecule type name, residue name and
> atom name
> (the atom type name is set by the force field). Currently different
> force fields in Gromacs
> use different naming schemes, for instance: CL, Cl, Cl-
> Also the user somehow needs to know these names when running genion.
>
> My question is if there is a best choice for these names.
> Maybe some force fields have names for this?
> Is there a pdb or IUPAC standard (I guess this is capitalized without
> the sign)?
>
> It would be convenient if all force fields use the same naming scheme.
>
> Berk
>
>   




More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers mailing list