[gmx-developers] improving verification votes in gerrit

Szilárd Páll szilard.pall at cbr.su.se
Fri Mar 8 16:05:55 CET 2013


PS: I suggest that we allow a week or so for objections or suggestions and
then we try to implement it.

Here's the related redmine issue:
http://redmine.gromacs.org/issues/1185


--
Szilárd


On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Mark Abraham <mark.j.abraham at gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Szilárd Páll <szilard.pall at cbr.su.se>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I suggest that we allow and encourage code verification/testing by
>> users/developers to complement the Jenkins verification.
>>
>> Why?
>> - there is only +1 verify, no +2
>> - hence regular registered users can't vote for verify;
>> - we should be able to distinguish between the Jenkins verification and
>> user verification (=testing), but allow submission only with +2 Verify or
>> more;
>>
>> I suggest:
>> - allowing any developer to give +1 verified;
>> - bumping the Jenkins verification to +2;
>> - requiring Verified +2 for submit;
>> - allowing core-dev to give +2? (Not sure about this, it would only be
>> useful to override the failed jenkins verification).
>>
>> Let me know what you all think!
>>
>
> Sounds great.
>
> Mark
>
> --
> gmx-developers mailing list
> gmx-developers at gromacs.org
> http://lists.gromacs.org/mailman/listinfo/gmx-developers
> Please don't post (un)subscribe requests to the list. Use the
> www interface or send it to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-developers/attachments/20130308/4f2f27e4/attachment.html>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers mailing list