[gmx-developers] [gmx-core] removal of encad and gmx FF in 5.0?
Rossen Apostolov
rossen at kth.se
Fri Feb 14 17:38:32 CET 2014
On 14/02/14 17:12, Mark Abraham wrote:
> Removing encad and gmx sounds good. Probably don't have time to rip
> out the code that supported encad.
>
I can look at that.
> We're happy to add forcefields that are used by more than one person,
> have been extensively tested, have an associated publication record,
> etc. Any particular suggestions, Alexey? Others?
>
I vote also for Stockholm lipids, it can be quite useful, but hasn't got
much publicity.
Rossen
> Off the top of my head, Charmm36 would be an obvious thing to add. My
> reservation here is that there's not really ever been a good way to
> run CHARMM-style non-bondeds in GROMACS. I suspect this will change in
> 5.0 with Verlet-kernel support for switch functions, but perhaps a
> fully validated forcefield and workflow port for 5.1 would be a good
> joint project. Thoughts, Justin?
>
> Mark
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Alexey Shvetsov
> <alexxy at omrb.pnpi.spb.ru <mailto:alexxy at omrb.pnpi.spb.ru>> wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> Its good idea to drop deprecated force fields!
>
> BTW are there any plans to add some new forcefields from
> contributuions pages?
>
> Peter Kasson ????? 14-02-2014 18:47:
>
> Sounds good to me! If anyone has a burning need to use them, they
> can still of course do so, but having them part of the supported
> distribution doesn't seem like a good idea at this point.
>
> --Peter
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Peter Kasson, MD, PhD
> Assistant Professor
> Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biological Physics
> and of Biomedical Engineering
> University of Virginia
>
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:39 AM, Erik Lindahl
> <erik.lindahl at scilifelab.se
> <mailto:erik.lindahl at scilifelab.se>> wrote:
>
> Agreed!
>
> On 14 Feb 2014, at 06:37, Rossen Apostolov <rossen at kth.se
> <mailto:rossen at kth.se>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Encad and GmxFF have been deprecated for a while. Now
> before 5.0
>
> is a good time for cleanup, if nobody is using them.
>
>
> Any objections?
>
> Rossen
> _______________________________________________
> Gromacs Core Developers mailing list
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-core
>
> [1]
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gromacs Core Developers mailing list
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-core
> [1]
>
>
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1]
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-core
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Alexey 'Alexxy' Shvetsov
> Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, NRC Kurchatov Institute,
> Gatchina, Russia
> Department of Molecular and Radiation Biophysics
> Gentoo Team Ru
> Gentoo Linux Dev
> mailto:alexxyum at gmail.com <mailto:alexxyum at gmail.com>
> mailto:alexxy at gentoo.org <mailto:alexxy at gentoo.org>
> mailto:alexxy at omrb.pnpi.spb.ru <mailto:alexxy at omrb.pnpi.spb.ru>
>
> --
> Gromacs Developers mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List
> before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-developers
> or send a mail to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org>.
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-developers/attachments/20140214/ae397d38/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list