[gmx-developers] NVIDIA misrepresenting simulation package performance
mark.j.abraham at gmail.com
Tue May 24 10:40:24 CEST 2016
Yeah, we've complained about this a few times. We sometimes get requests
for updated benchmarks, which I find easy to forget to prioritise given how
they use them. But I could explain why I'm so forgetful...
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 8:47 AM David van der Spoel <spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se>
> my attention was brought to this page by a colleague:
> Here, NVIDIA gives the relative performance of different codes on their
> GPUs. As we know, GROMACS is very efficient on CPUs and therefore the
> scale-up is not as impressive as other codes.
> Should we try to have NVIDIA post a fairer picture (ns/day)?
> Or debunk it on our own website?
> David van der Spoel, Ph.D., Professor of Biology
> Dept. of Cell & Molec. Biol., Uppsala University.
> Box 596, 75124 Uppsala, Sweden. Phone: +46184714205.
> spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se http://folding.bmc.uu.se
> Gromacs Developers mailing list
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List before
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> or send a mail to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers