[gmx-developers] Gerrit, Jenkins and website back up
Vedran Miletić
vedran at miletic.net
Thu May 18 18:20:46 CEST 2017
On 03/22/2017 01:50 PM, Mark Abraham wrote:
> Related: need better SEO for the new site and especially the
> generated documentation sites needs attention. Repo-generated pages
> takes ages to crawl up in ranking and deploying a new set of pages
> for every patch release ruins ranking. As a result, most of the
> google top hits tend to be from the old wiki, old manual pages or at
> best v5.1 documentation pages.
>
>
> Pages generated from the source repo should be those which match the
> source version being documented. They are thus exactly those for which
> we do not want to target high SEO for general queries. The SEO
> optimization targets are generally the WordPress pages.
>
> Googling "gromacs documentation" and "gromacs 5.1 documentation" do
> exactly the intended job - return at first rank the page most specific
> to the query (2016 is a bit strange, google seems to have latched onto
> the beta2 page). We do not want "gromacs performance", "gromacs MPI",
> "gromacs umbrella sampling" or "how to make mdrun fast" searches
> returning at high rank a repo-generated page that matches e.g the 2016.2
> release. A brief and general page on e.g. mdrun performance makes sense
> for users (and SEO), but it should direct users on to pages with
> whatever details they actually want, rather than itself containing
> everything that was ever relevant to the topic. :-)
>
> Mark
>
Just had an idea today regarding SEO. How about we do what Sphinx, the
creator of the tool we use, does: http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/stable/
is the link to the latest stable documentation, but versioned
documentations are also available at e.g. http://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/1.1/
On the technical side, a (periodically updating) symlink on the web
server would suffice, no need for funky webserver rewrites.
V.
--
Vedran Miletić
vedran.miletic.net
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list