[gmx-developers] Missing dihedral define
Zachmann, Martin
m.zachmann at tum.de
Fri Aug 2 16:51:25 CEST 2019
I will try, but I dont have a redmine account yet,
so it will take a few minutes.
regards Martin
________________________________
From: gromacs.org_gmx-developers-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se <gromacs.org_gmx-developers-bounces at maillist.sys.kth.se> on behalf of Berk Hess <hess at kth.se>
Sent: Friday, August 2, 2019 4:40:06 PM
To: gmx-developers at gromacs.org
Subject: Re: [gmx-developers] Missing dihedral define
Thanks for reporting this.
Could you file an issue on redmine.gromacs.org and attach the input files needed to reproduce this?
Cheers,
Berk
On 02/08/2019 16.34, Zachmann, Martin wrote:
Hello
there is a separate residue for charged GLN (QLN) in the OPLS-forcefield file aminoacids.rtp.
This residue uses the preprocessor define "dih_GLN_chi4_C_C_O_H" for a dihedral parameter set.
However, this macro is not defined anywhere (esp. not in ffbonded.itp with all the others).
The reason why grompp does not complain, is because the function push_bond() uses sscanf
nread = sscanf(line,format,&cc[0],.....
expecting double values. When strings are read instead, the variable nread is zero, and grompp assumes
default values for this dihedral.
If I'm correct, we should either delete the non-existing macro, or have to add values for this dihedral.
Thank you for your time,
regards Martin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-developers/attachments/20190802/c1053ea8/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list