[gmx-developers] Please cancel outdated CI pipelines
Paul bauer
paul.bauer.q at gmail.com
Tue Sep 29 11:09:31 CEST 2020
Eric, one question, how do you set the total number of ranks for your
jobs in the python script?
I think the issue might be that you are oversubscribing because you are
trying to use the whole kubernetes cluster, slowing everything down.
Cheers
Paul
P.s.: https://gitlab.com/gromacs/gromacs/-/merge_requests/594 Is ready
now and works as intended.
On 28/09/2020 21:15, Erik Lindahl wrote:
> PS:
>
> Note that there are two settings: The *request* you set for CPU and
> memory is guaranteed when you execute (although we count each hardware
> thread as a CPU), while the limit is something you ask for, but aren't
> guaranteed.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Erik
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 9:14 PM Erik Lindahl <erik.lindahl at gmail.com
> <mailto:erik.lindahl at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Given that several other test containers finish in ~2 minutes, I
> think it's relatively unlikely that random fluctuating resource
> contention would systematically always affect the gmxapi test
> every time it is run, but no other jobs :-)
>
> The whole point of k8s/docker is that the runtime environment is
> standardized; what performance do you see if you run the same
> container e.g. on your laptop, desktop, or any other cloud
> resource when assigning two hardware threads to it?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Erik
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 8:38 PM Eric Irrgang
> <ericirrgang at gmail.com <mailto:ericirrgang at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
> > On Sep 28, 2020, at 6:00 PM, Erik Lindahl
> <erik.lindahl at gmail.com <mailto:erik.lindahl at gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> > - gmx-api. They both take 12-15 minutes on two cores, and
> there are four of them.
>
> I think there is something wrong with the way resources are
> detected in the CI Kubernetes environment that is causing
> oversubscription. I think at least 90% of that time is due to
> resource contention. The jobs only take a few seconds when run
> locally. I've mentioned this a couple of times to Paul and
> Mark but we haven't been able to prioritize it. It sounds like
> Mark and I may take a closer look in October, but I can't
> troubleshoot effectively because the run-time environment is
> opaque to me.
>
> Otherwise, I agree.
>
> --
> Gromacs Developers mailing list
>
> * Please search the archive at
> http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List
> before posting!
>
> * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>
> * For (un)subscribe requests visit
> https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-developers
> or send a mail to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org
> <mailto:gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org>.
>
>
>
> --
> Erik Lindahl <erik.lindahl at dbb.su.se <mailto:erik.lindahl at dbb.su.se>>
> Professor of Biophysics, Dept. Biochemistry & Biophysics,
> Stockholm University
> Science for Life Laboratory, Box 1031, 17121 Solna, Sweden
>
>
>
> --
> Erik Lindahl <erik.lindahl at dbb.su.se <mailto:erik.lindahl at dbb.su.se>>
> Professor of Biophysics, Dept. Biochemistry & Biophysics, Stockholm
> University
> Science for Life Laboratory, Box 1031, 17121 Solna, Sweden
>
--
Paul Bauer, PhD
GROMACS Development Manager
KTH Stockholm, SciLifeLab
0046737308594
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-developers/attachments/20200929/2ad2853e/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers
mailing list