[gmx-developers] Unsquashed MR in master

Berk Hess hess at kth.se
Wed Oct 6 11:45:10 CEST 2021


On 2021-10-06 11:31 , Szilárd Páll wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I agree with the decision, as there has been no vote (other than mine) 
> for fixing the issue, it seems to be of no concern to the broader 
> community, so we should move on.
>
> Is there any action that implicitly unchecks the "Squash commits" 
> checkbox and that we can do something about in the gitlab configs?

I don't thinks so.

This MR might have been from before the time where "Squash commits" is 
turned on by defaulkt.

Cheers,

Berk

>
> Side-note: Mark, why do you think we could have not just force-pushed 
> to master to rewrite the branch?
>
> Cheers,
> --
> Szilárd
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 10:59 AM Magnus Lundborg 
> <magnus.lundborg at scilifelab.se <mailto:magnus.lundborg at scilifelab.se>> 
> wrote:
>
>     Hi everyone,
>
>     As there hasn't been (m)any votes (on this list) for rewriting
>     history to fix these commits the consensus now seems to be that we
>     go on from the current state and proceed merging into master
>     again. I hope this will not cause too much problems. For now I,
>     myself, will not push the 'Merge' button for a while.
>
>     Regards,
>     Magnus
>
>     On 2021-10-06 07:08, Mark Abraham wrote:
>>     Hi,
>>
>>     I think it's clear to follow normal practice and not rewrite
>>     history. Doing so means we have to rename master, delete it, push
>>     a fixed one, organize to replace the updated content, and then
>>     fix/delete the repo of anybody who's pulled in the meantime,
>>     including projects that automatically mirror us (including our
>>     own mirror on github). That's a small amount of activity for some
>>     people. Doing nothing means that there's a chance in future of
>>     someone doing a bisection and hitting one of these 24 commits
>>     that might not build or might fail a test. If they do, most of
>>     the time they'll see that the failure mode is different and they
>>     can move to a different nearby commit and try again. This is
>>     already what they would have to do if the case they're
>>     investigated was something that only failed in post-submit
>>     testing or the pre-submit testing that is not a formal
>>     requirement for gitlab to permit an MR to be submitted.
>>
>>     On Tue, 5 Oct 2021 at 18:57, Magnus Lundborg
>>     <magnus.lundborg at scilifelab.se
>>     <mailto:magnus.lundborg at scilifelab.se>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hi everyone,
>>
>>         By mistake I merged an MR without squashing all commits
>>         today. The
>>         question now is if we should try to restore the master branch
>>         and
>>         rewrite the history or if we should let it be. Leaving it as
>>         it is might
>>         cause trouble with future 'git bisect' since some commits in
>>         between
>>         might not compile or might fail tests. But on the other hand,
>>         rewriting
>>         history is not optimal either, especially since there is at
>>         least one
>>         commit merged afterwards. I think it could be good not to
>>         merge anything
>>         more until we have decided how to proceed. What do you think
>>         would be best?
>>
>>         I'm sorry about this mess.
>>
>>         Regards,
>>         Magnus
>>
>>         -- 
>>         Gromacs Developers mailing list
>>
>>         * Please search the archive at
>>         http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List
>>         <http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List>
>>         before posting!
>>
>>         * Can't post? Read
>>         http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>>         <http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists>
>>
>>         * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>>         https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-developers
>>         <https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-developers>
>>         or send a mail to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org
>>         <mailto:gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org>.
>>
>>
>
>     -- 
>     Gromacs Developers mailing list
>
>     * Please search the archive at
>     http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List
>     <http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists/GMX-developers_List>
>     before posting!
>
>     * Can't post? Read http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists
>     <http://www.gromacs.org/Support/Mailing_Lists>
>
>     * For (un)subscribe requests visit
>     https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-developers
>     <https://maillist.sys.kth.se/mailman/listinfo/gromacs.org_gmx-developers>
>     or send a mail to gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org
>     <mailto:gmx-developers-request at gromacs.org>.
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://maillist.sys.kth.se/pipermail/gromacs.org_gmx-developers/attachments/20211006/be059d07/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-developers mailing list