[gmx-users] General questions II
David van der Spoel
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se
Sat Dec 15 21:05:34 CET 2001
On Sat, 15 Dec 2001, Marc Baaden wrote:
>- what are the largest timesteps people have used with Gromacs ?
> and in what conditions ?
> (eg maybe 5 fs when using constraint=bond-angles ???)
7 fs using dummy particles: see Feenstra et al. JCC
@Article{Feenstra99a,
author = {K. Anton Feenstra and Berk Hess and Herman J. C.
Berendsen},
title = {Improving Efficiency of Large Time-scale Molecular
Dynamics Simulations of Hydrogen-rich Systems},
journal = BTjcc,
year = 1999,
volume = 20,
pages = {786-798}
}
>
>- when you do a simulation in vacuo, Gromacs suggests to use
> nstcomm=-1, which makes sense. But if you have position
> restraints, you should not need this ?
No.
>- which of the com-removal / posres / freeze / pcoupling
> options are incompatible and why ?
> (I think what I noticed is that freeze+pcoupl is a very bad idea ..)
Some of the impossible grompp catches but not all.
Freeze + comm removal for instance is not checked for.
I'm sure we haven't tried all combinations
Groeten, David.
________________________________________________________________________
Dr. David van der Spoel, Biomedical center, Dept. of Biochemistry
Husargatan 3, Box 576, 75123 Uppsala, Sweden
phone: 46 18 471 4205 fax: 46 18 511 755
spoel at xray.bmc.uu.se spoel at gromacs.org http://zorn.bmc.uu.se/~spoel
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list