[gmx-users] Re:Question about CCl4 box!
³ÂÅæÈ«
gromacs at 163.com
Sat May 3 03:53:00 CEST 2003
Dear David:
Thank you for you kindly help.
> > ;No constraints
> > constraints = none
> > constraint_algorithm = shake
> > shake_tor = 0.0001
>
> > rlist = 0.8
> > rcoulomb = 1.4
> > rvdw = 1.4
>
>
> This looks OK if you really don't want constraints, otherwise you would
> have to specify
> constraints = all-bonds
Maybe I haven't make clear of my problem!
I have fixed the CCl4 molecules by using constraints section in my ccl4.itp file to fixed my molecules.
The following is my ccl4.itp:(The parameters is adapt form OPLS-AA force field).
[ atomtypes ]
;type mass charge ptype sigma epsilon
CCL4 12.01100 0.248 A 3.80000e-01 2.09340e-01
CLCL4 35.45300 -0.062 A 3.47000e-01 1.11369e+00
[ moleculetype ]
; name nrexcl
CCl4 3
[ atoms ]
; nr type resnr residu atom cgnr charge
1 CCL4 1 CCl4 CT1 1 0.248
2 CLCL4 1 CCl4 Cl2 1 -0.062
3 CLCL4 1 CCl4 Cl3 1 -0.062
4 CLCL4 1 CCl4 Cl4 1 -0.062
5 CLCL4 1 CCl4 Cl5 1 -0.062
[ constraints ]
; ai aj funct b0
1 2 1 0.17690
1 3 1 0.17690
1 4 1 0.17690
1 5 1 0.17690
2 3 1 0.2888765
2 4 1 0.2888765
2 5 1 0.2888765
3 4 1 0.2888765
3 5 1 0.2888765
4 5 1 0.2888765
> What's the problem?
My question is:
why I use to the tau_p=5.0 or>5.0 ,the simulation can run smoothly.But when I change the value to 2 or 1, the simulation will carsh after generates a series step* files.?
Can I use the lincs other than shake for the simulation?
> By the way, please send further questions to the gmx-users list.
I have already seen the e-mail to the gmx-users list simultaneously.
=============================================================
ÕæÕýVIPÏíÊÜ£¬ÏëÔõô»¨£¬¾ÍÔõô»¨£¡ http://vip.163.com
Äê¶ÈÊ®¼ÑÅ®ÐÔÕ¾µãÆÀÑ¡¿ªÈüÁË£¡ http://www.nease.net
°Ù·Ö°ÙÅ®ÓÑ - ´º¼¾Ñ¡ÃÀ»î¶¯! http://love.163.com
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list