[gmx-users] dummies...confused
Anton Feenstra
feenstra at chem.vu.nl
Mon Oct 6 08:56:06 CEST 2003
Senthil Kandasamy wrote:
> I do not understand the negative values for the "funct" variable.
A trick to invert the chirality. Not sure if it is actually documented.
(Doesn't necessarily work for all interaction functions.)
> Also,is the first column in the dummies directive is the atom number of
> the dummy to be constructed (with the atomname e.g. MNH3), or is it the
> atom number of the hydrogen atoms beng dummyfied?
The dummy to be constructed, which is in this case the hydrogen atom.
The MNH3 is not a dummy atom in this terminology, but a 'Dummy Mass',
it doesn't correspond to any physical atom.
--
Groetjes,
Anton
_____________ _______________________________________________________
| | |
| _ _ ___,| K. Anton Feenstra |
| / \ / \'| | | Dept. of Pharmacochem. - Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam |
|( | )| | | De Boelelaan 1083 - 1081 HV Amsterdam - Netherlands |
| \_/ \_/ | | | Tel: +31 20 44 47608 - Fax: +31 20 44 47610 |
| | Feenstra at chem.vu.nl - www.chem.vu.nl/~feenstra/ |
| | "If You See Me Getting High, Knock Me Down" |
| | (Red Hot Chili Peppers) |
|_____________|_______________________________________________________|
More information about the gromacs.org_gmx-users
mailing list